Aggregation and Coalition Formation on Valuebased Decision for Support Bridge Selection

Value-based decision is very complicated
since many parties involved. Where a number of
stakeholders are involved in choosing a single alternative
from a set of solution alternatives, there are different
concern caused by differing preferences, experiences, and
background. Therefore, a negotiation is required to
enable each stakeholder to evaluate and rank the solution
alternatives before engaging into negotiation with the
other stakeholders. Decision techniques applied to
determine the relative value of the alternative solutions
for performing the function. The results demonstrate a
comparison of aggregation and coalition formation in a
multi criteria group decision and negotiation. It further
emphasizes the importance of performance evaluation in
the design process and value-based decision