A comparison study between WSDMDA and NDT methodologies using Quality Evaluation Framework

Mukhtar, M.A.O. and Hassan, M.F.B. and Jaafar, J.B. and Rahim, L.A. (2016) A comparison study between WSDMDA and NDT methodologies using Quality Evaluation Framework. In: UNSPECIFIED.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2....

Abstract

The selection of appropriate Model-Driven Web Engineering (MDWE) methodology as a tool to develop web applications has become an important issue in terms of features that need to be included in the web site. Quality Evaluation Framework (QuEF) is used specifically to evaluate MDWE methodologies and other methodologies in general. It can be used to evaluate either a well-established methodology or a new methodology in early stages of development. In this paper, by using QuEF, NDT as a well-established MDWE methodology has been compared with WSDMDA as a new methodology. The comparison has been conducted based on only Functionality quality characteristic of QuEF and three features namely Model-Driven Engineering (MDE), Web Modeling and Tool Support. Results show that WSDMDA is obtained a higher value for Web Modeling feature, while a higher value for other two features has been obtained by NDT methodology. © 2016 IEEE.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (UNSPECIFIED)
Impact Factor: cited By 0
Uncontrolled Keywords: Information science; Quality control; Site selection; Software architecture, Appropriate models; Comparison study; Model transformation; Model-driven Engineering; Model-driven web engineerings; Quality characteristic; Quality evaluation; Web engineering, Nondestructive examination
Depositing User: Ms Sharifah Fahimah Saiyed Yeop
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2022 07:10
Last Modified: 25 Mar 2022 07:10
URI: http://scholars.utp.edu.my/id/eprint/30533

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item